SOCL vs. TQQQ
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 8.04%/yr vs 45.48%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -22.66% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 8.04%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.48% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- YTD
- -22.66%
- 6M
- -22.03%
- 1Y
- -17.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- -9.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 41.43%
- 6M
- 35.75%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 58.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 45.48%
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -22.66% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 41.43% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and TQQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between SOCL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
TQQQ
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
TQQQ
Technology
SOCL
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
TQQQ
Industrials
SOCL
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Energy
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Utilities
SOCL
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
TQQQ
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.30 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.74 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 8.72 | -9.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -81.66% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -36.97% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -58.04% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -81.66% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -81.66% | +12.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.44% | -14.65% | -29.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.02% | -18.49% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.83% | 11.59% | +5.24% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is 9.70%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that SOCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | 27.27% | -17.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.19% | 43.35% | -24.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.07% | 53.39% | -29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 67.41% | -37.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 66.32% | -38.71% |
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.42% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to SOCL (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.48% vs 8.04% for SOCL. On fees, SOCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.48% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.42% for TQQQ.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer