SOCL vs. ILCB
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for ILCB. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
SOCL vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
SOCL vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 8.17% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -8.51% | 22.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ILCB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SOCL and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ILCB
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ILCB
Technology
SOCL
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ILCB
Industrials
SOCL
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ILCB
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ILCB
Energy
SOCL
-
ILCB
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ILCB
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ILCB
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ILCB
Utilities
SOCL
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ILCB
SOCL vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.31 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.41 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 10.64 | -11.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -51.53% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -9.09% | -24.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -19.05% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -25.47% | -40.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -35.30% | -33.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -3.31% | -41.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -6.23% | -15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 2.06% | +14.89% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 4.81%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 4.81% | +4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 9.96% | +9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 12.64% | +11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 17.22% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 18.19% | +9.41% |
SOCL vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ILCB's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ILCB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to ILCB (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 14.93% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer