PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNXFX vs. CCFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than CCFAX's 6.79% return.


SNXFX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.85%
YTD
11.89%
6M
11.81%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.29%

CCFAX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.96%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.25%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
11.89%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.93%
CCFAX
American Funds College 2036 Fund
6.79%16.36%13.70%19.10%-18.41%12.44%16.77%22.43%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and CCFAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.94

The correlation between SNXFX and CCFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. CCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CCFAX
CCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNXFXCCFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.82

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

12.56

+2.72

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and CCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNXFXCCFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.33

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.67

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.66

-0.08

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than CCFAX's maximum drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and CCFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNXFXCCFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-25.80%

-29.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-6.63%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-11.04%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-25.34%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-5.17%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.49%

+0.44%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) at 2.35%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNXFXCCFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.35%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

6.33%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

8.04%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

11.50%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

13.33%

+5.40%

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CCFAX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNXFX vs. CCFAX - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than CCFAX's 6.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCFAX
American Funds College 2036 Fund
6.65%7.10%5.41%1.75%4.66%7.82%4.37%2.61%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.30%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SNXFX and CCFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNXFX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to CCFAX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs CCFAX's -25.80%.

SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and CCFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer