SNSR vs. TDV

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 7.34%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for TDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.

Performance

SNSR vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 18.57% return.

SNSR

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: 32.97%
• 6M: 31.47%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: —

TDV

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: 18.57%
• 6M: 16.16%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	32.97%	6.46%	-0.45%	23.06%	-25.50%	23.66%	35.05%	7.14%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	18.57%	16.05%	9.72%	27.29%	-15.94%	28.29%	29.00%	2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and TDV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019	0.90

The correlation between SNSR and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNSR	TDV
Technology	80.5%	90.7%
Industrials	13.6%	4.4%
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.2%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SNSR vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 44
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

TDV

TDV Risk / Return Rank: 51
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNSR	TDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.41	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.94	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.73	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	8.87	-2.01

SNSR vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and TDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNSR	TDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-32.78%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-9.55%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	-22.51%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	-25.11%	-12.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.66%	-4.08%	-4.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-5.35%	-4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	2.94%	+1.95%

Volatility

SNSR vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 8.40%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNSR	TDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.22%	8.40%	+4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.71%	14.62%	+7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.28%	18.47%	+7.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.69%	20.70%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	23.29%	+1.59%

SNSR vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNSR vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than TDV's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	1.02%	1.09%	1.16%	1.16%	1.67%	1.08%	1.10%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNSR and TDV in my portfolio?

SNSR and TDV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNSR or TDV?

SNSR has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to TDV (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs TDV's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, SNSR or TDV?

On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 13.05% vs 7.34% for SNSR. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 8.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNSR or TDV?

Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNSR or TDV?

TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNSR or TDV?

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.41% for SNSR.

What is the main difference between SNSR and TDV?

SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.66% for TDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.