SNSR vs. BOTZ
SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNSR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.51%/yr vs 3.18%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
SNSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- YTD
- 44.93%
- 6M
- 43.21%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 44.93% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 47.90% | -17.66% | 28.59% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and BOTZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SNSR and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNSR
BOTZ
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SNSR
BOTZ
Industrials
SNSR
BOTZ
Healthcare
SNSR
BOTZ
Communication Services
SNSR
BOTZ
Basic Materials
SNSR
BOTZ
Utilities
SNSR
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
SNSR
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
SNSR
-
BOTZ
Energy
SNSR
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
SNSR
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
SNSR
-
BOTZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNSR vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SNSR
BOTZ
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNSR | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 1.53 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 5.26 | +5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNSR | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.24 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.12 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNSR | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -55.54% | +17.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -19.34% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -29.02% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -55.54% | +17.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -3.27% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -18.32% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 5.63% | -1.03% |
Volatility
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNSR | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 7.77% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 18.40% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 23.98% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 26.73% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 25.73% | -1.06% |
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SNSR and BOTZ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
SNSR vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNSR and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNSR has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, SNSR leads with 9.51% vs 3.18% for BOTZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SNSR has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNSR and BOTZ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.37% for SNSR.
SNSR is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index.
SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNSR and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer