PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPD vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPD vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return.


SNPD

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.10%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and FVD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.94

The correlation between SNPD and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPD vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNPD
FVD

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
11.6%

Industrials

17.5%
14.2%

Utilities

14.4%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
5.6%

Financial Services

8.5%
19.1%

Basic Materials

7.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

6.8%
8.1%

Technology

6.3%
6.1%

Healthcare

4.9%
7.8%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.0%

Energy

3.1%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SNPD
18.7%
FVD
11.6%

Industrials

SNPD
17.5%
FVD
14.2%

Utilities

SNPD
14.4%
FVD
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SNPD
8.7%
FVD
5.6%

Financial Services

SNPD
8.5%
FVD
19.1%

Basic Materials

SNPD
7.1%
FVD
2.1%

Real Estate

SNPD
6.8%
FVD
8.1%

Technology

SNPD
6.3%
FVD
6.1%

Healthcare

SNPD
4.9%
FVD
7.8%

Communication Services

SNPD
3.4%
FVD
3.0%

Energy

SNPD
3.1%
FVD
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPD vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPDFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.95

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

2.58

+2.14

SNPD vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPDFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.72

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPDFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-51.00%

+35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-7.23%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-11.97%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-5.96%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-5.44%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.66%

+0.24%

Volatility

SNPD vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPDFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.62%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

6.73%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

9.50%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

12.76%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

15.44%

-2.30%

SNPD vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNPD vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.01%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SNPD and FVD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNPD has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 8.75% vs 8.25% for FVD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.61% for FVD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPD and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer