SNOY vs. GOOW

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

SNOY vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 25.16% return, which is significantly higher than GOOW's 12.21% return.

SNOY

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 13.82%
• 6M: 32.32%
• YTD: 25.16%
• 1Y: 23.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.44%

GOOW

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -5.72%
• 6M: 5.68%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	25.16%	-0.00%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	12.21%	71.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and GOOW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 21
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GOOW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	GOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	—	—

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and GOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	GOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-24.88%	-26.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-15.61%	+15.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.36%	-5.90%	-6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	GOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.91%	38.05%	+19.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.07%	38.05%	+13.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.07%	38.05%	+13.02%

SNOY vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNOY and GOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

SNOY vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.91%, more than GOOW's 42.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	42.52%	19.77%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	69.91%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and GOOW in my portfolio?

SNOY and GOOW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or GOOW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or GOOW?

SNOY and GOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or GOOW?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 69.91%, compared with 42.52% for GOOW.

What is the main difference between SNOY and GOOW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.