GOOW vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOW returned 103.29% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GOOW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -38.54% return.

GOOW

• 1D: 7.98%
• 1M: -1.82%
• 6M: 3.91%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 1Y: 103.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 92.03%

PLTW

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: -21.93%
• YTD: -38.54%
• 1Y: -30.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	$1.99M	$1.77M	$2.25M
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.46M	$2.75M	$3.76M

GOOW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	13.56%	71.16%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-38.54%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and PLTW is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.29

GOOW vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GOOW	PLTW
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	20.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GOOW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOW

GOOW Risk / Return Rank: 90
GOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOOW	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	-0.52	+3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	-0.42	+3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.95	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	-0.56	+4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	-1.02	+11.88

GOOW vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOW and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOW	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.44%	-57.27%	+31.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.44%	-57.27%	+31.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.60%	-49.73%	+35.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-25.20%	+18.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.24%	31.48%	-22.24%

Volatility

GOOW vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) have volatilities of 15.50% and 15.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOW	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.50%	15.73%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.46%	48.95%	-18.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.64%	62.54%	-22.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.39%	73.53%	-34.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.39%	73.53%	-34.14%

GOOW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOW and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GOOW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.80%, less than PLTW's 138.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	42.80%	19.77%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	138.40%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOW and PLTW in my portfolio?

GOOW and PLTW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOOW or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to GOOW (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOW dropped -25.44% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, GOOW or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, GOOW leads with 103.29% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOW has been the lower-risk option at 15.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOOW or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, GOOW has performed better with a 103.29% return vs -30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOW or PLTW?

GOOW and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOW or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 138.40%, compared with 42.80% for GOOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.