GOOW vs. GOOY
GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOW returned 103.29% vs 64.48% for GOOY. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GOOW vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 11.24% return.
GOOW
- 1D
- 7.98%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 103.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 92.03%
GOOY
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 64.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.99M | $1.77M | $2.25M | |
| $4.95M | $4.53M | $7.81M |
GOOW vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 13.56% | 71.16% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 11.24% | 49.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOW and GOOY is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GOOW and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOW vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
GOOW
GOOY
GOOW vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOW | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.53 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 10.51 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOW vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOW | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -24.40% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.44% | -17.70% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -10.52% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -6.46% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 5.94% | +3.30% |
Volatility
GOOW vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) has a higher volatility of 15.50% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 10.30%. This indicates that GOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOW | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.50% | 10.30% | +5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.46% | 20.43% | +10.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 25.69% | +13.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 23.89% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 23.89% | +15.50% |
GOOW vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOOW and GOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GOOW vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.80%, less than GOOY's 55.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 42.80% | 19.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 55.09% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GOOW and GOOY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GOOW has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to GOOY (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOW dropped -25.44% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOW leads with 103.29% vs 64.48% for GOOY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 10.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOW has performed better with a 103.29% return vs 64.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOW and GOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 55.09%, compared with 42.80% for GOOW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
GOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOW and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer