PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 11.24% return.


GOOW

1D
7.98%
1M
-1.82%
6M
3.91%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
103.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
92.03%

GOOY

1D
5.28%
1M
-1.93%
6M
4.22%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
64.48%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.99M$1.77M$2.25M
$4.95M$4.53M$7.81M

GOOW vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and GOOY is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.96

The correlation between GOOW and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOW
GOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOW vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOWGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.53

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

10.51

+0.34

GOOW vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOW and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-24.40%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-17.70%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.60%

-10.52%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-6.46%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.24%

5.94%

+3.30%

Volatility

GOOW vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) has a higher volatility of 15.50% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 10.30%. This indicates that GOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

10.30%

+5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.46%

20.43%

+10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.64%

25.69%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.39%

23.89%

+15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.39%

23.89%

+15.50%

GOOW vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOW and GOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOW vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.80%, less than GOOY's 55.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
42.80%19.77%0.00%0.00%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
55.09%41.50%36.74%7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GOOW and GOOY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOOW has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to GOOY (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOW dropped -25.44% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOW leads with 103.29% vs 64.48% for GOOY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 10.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOW has performed better with a 103.29% return vs 64.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOW and GOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 55.09%, compared with 42.80% for GOOW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

GOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer