PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. GDXW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than GDXW's -20.04% return.


GOOW

1D
7.98%
1M
-1.82%
6M
3.91%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
103.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
92.03%

GDXW

1D
-3.84%
1M
-6.91%
6M
-28.00%
YTD
-20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.31M$1.39M$2.06M
$1.99M$1.77M$2.25M

GOOW vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
13.56%15.68%
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
-20.04%25.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and GDXW is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. GDXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOW
GOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOW vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOWGDXWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

GOOW vs. GDXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum GDXW drawdown of -46.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and GDXW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWGDXWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-46.79%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.60%

-43.67%

+29.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-19.25%

+12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.24%

Volatility

GOOW vs. GDXW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWGDXWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.64%

61.28%

-21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.39%

61.28%

-21.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.39%

61.28%

-21.89%

GOOW vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOW and GDXW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOW vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.80%, less than GDXW's 59.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
59.35%7.48%
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
42.80%19.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOW and GDXW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOW and GDXW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 59.35%, compared with 42.80% for GOOW.

GOOW is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXW is Gold.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and GDXW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer