SNOV vs. CIBR

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

SNOV (FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. SNOV is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOV returned 16.73% vs 23.08% for CIBR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNOV charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

SNOV vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOV achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 27.85% return.

SNOV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 9.65%
• YTD: 9.65%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -3.15%
• 6M: 27.85%
• YTD: 27.85%
• 1Y: 23.08%
• 3Y*: 26.67%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: 18.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOV vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November	9.65%	7.01%	9.19%	5.83%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	27.85%	13.06%	18.21%	12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOV and CIBR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.58

The correlation between SNOV and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNOV vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOV

SNOV Risk / Return Rank: 55
SNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOV vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOV	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.91	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.38	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.17	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	1.05	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	2.41	+6.75

SNOV vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOV and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOV vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.36%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOV and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOV	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.36%	-33.89%	+18.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-21.99%	+14.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.32%	+3.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-8.66%	+6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	9.59%	-7.76%

Volatility

SNOV vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is 1.88%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that SNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOV	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	8.59%	-6.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.03%	21.92%	-15.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	25.50%	-14.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.03%	25.14%	-14.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.03%	23.57%	-12.54%

SNOV vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOV vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

SNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOV and CIBR in my portfolio?

SNOV and CIBR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOV or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to SNOV (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOV dropped -15.36% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, SNOV or CIBR?

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 23.08% vs 16.73% for SNOV. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOV or CIBR?

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 23.08% return vs 16.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOV or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOV or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for SNOV.

What is the main difference between SNOV and CIBR?

SNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SNOV and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.