SNAV vs. VOTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while VOTE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 15.57%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for VOTE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.

Performance

SNAV vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNAV having a 11.57% return and VOTE slightly lower at 11.03%.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOTE

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 28.11%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	11.57%	15.54%	11.11%	12.25%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	11.03%	17.95%	25.23%	23.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and VOTE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023	0.92

The correlation between SNAV and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	VOTE
Technology	38.4%	35.5%
Financial Services	16.5%	11.7%
Healthcare	14.5%	8.6%
Industrials	6.6%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	10.2%
Communication Services	5.8%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	4.8%
Energy	2.4%	3.6%
Utilities	2.2%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 74
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 69
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNAV	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.34	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.19	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	3.10	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	14.23	-0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNAV vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNAV	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.34	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.80	+0.31

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and VOTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	VOTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-25.71%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-9.10%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-19.08%	+2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.70%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-6.14%	+3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.98%	-0.19%

Volatility

SNAV vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) at 2.96%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	VOTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	2.96%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	9.20%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	12.08%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.64%	17.15%	-3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.64%	17.15%	-3.51%

SNAV vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	0.90%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and VOTE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SNAV and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SNAV or VOTE?

SNAV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to VOTE (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or VOTE?

On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 22.81% vs 15.57% for SNAV. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or VOTE?

Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or VOTE?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or VOTE?

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and VOTE?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.05% for VOTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.