PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAV vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SNAV vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SNAV vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
-0.46%15.54%11.11%12.25%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
-0.53%4.51%5.36%2.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's -0.53% return.


SNAV

1D
1.47%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
0.53%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
10Y*

MFUL

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SNAV vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SNAV vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV
SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNAVMFULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

0.69

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

0.94

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.14

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.94

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.92

3.33

+3.59

SNAV vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAVMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

0.69

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

-0.20

+1.06

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and MFUL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SNAV vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


TTM2025202420232022
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%3.29%0.00%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.13%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and MFUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAVMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-16.41%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-3.77%

-7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-4.13%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-9.80%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.06%

+1.49%

Volatility

SNAV vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SNAVMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

1.89%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

3.10%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

4.75%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

4.22%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

4.22%

+9.59%