SNAV vs. BDGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNAV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Mohr, while BDGS is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Bridges. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 12.65%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for BDGS. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

SNAV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.35% return.

SNAV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -1.57%
• 6M: 7.11%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 1Y: 17.50%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.55%

BDGS

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 4.08%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 1Y: 10.14%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	$35.83K	$93.96K	$183.58K
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	$183.13K	$120.87K	$128.55K

SNAV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.92%	15.54%	11.11%	12.46%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.35%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and BDGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.68

The correlation between SNAV and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	BDGS
Technology	24.3%	38.9%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	12.2%
Healthcare	15.8%	7.1%
Utilities	10.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	8.0%	1.3%
Financial Services	7.4%	9.3%
Industrials	7.2%	6.8%
Communication Services	3.6%	15.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	3.6%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.5%
Energy	2.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 58
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 64
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNAV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.38	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.12	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.04	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	8.70	-1.14

SNAV vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-9.12%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-4.76%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-9.12%	-7.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-2.03%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-0.69%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.12%	+0.94%

Volatility

SNAV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is 2.87%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that SNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.21%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	6.11%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.47%	7.06%	+4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.61%	8.30%	+5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.61%	8.30%	+5.31%

SNAV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and BDGS in my portfolio?

SNAV and BDGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or BDGS?

BDGS has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to SNAV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, BDGS leads with 13.19% vs 12.65% for SNAV. On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SNAV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, BDGS has performed better with a 13.19% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and BDGS?

SNAV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BDGS is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.