SNAV vs. SPTM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 13.47%/yr vs 19.64%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

SNAV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 10.86% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 8.27%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 18.56%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 8.54%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	10.21%	15.54%	11.11%	12.29%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	10.86%	16.93%	23.87%	22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and SPTM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.92

The correlation between SNAV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	SPTM
Technology	46.0%	37.4%
Financial Services	9.6%	11.4%
Industrials	8.0%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	10.1%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.4%
Communication Services	6.9%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.4%
Energy	2.7%	3.3%
Utilities	2.6%	2.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 64
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 67
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.73	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.40	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.50	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.51	11.03	-1.53

SNAV vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-54.80%	+38.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-8.68%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-18.87%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-0.88%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-9.02%	+6.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.96%	0.00%

Volatility

SNAV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is 3.34%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that SNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	3.98%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	9.90%	-1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	12.53%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.66%	16.97%	-3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.66%	18.02%	-4.36%

SNAV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.06%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SNAV and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SNAV or SPTM?

SPTM has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SNAV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or SPTM?

On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 19.64% vs 13.47% for SNAV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SNAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or SPTM?

Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or SPTM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and SPTM?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.