SNAV vs. UNOV
SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while UNOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 15.57%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for UNOV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.
Performance
SNAV vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.40% return.
SNAV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 25.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 13.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAV vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF | 11.57% | 15.54% | 11.11% | 12.25% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.40% | 9.92% | 9.42% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAV and UNOV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SNAV and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNAV vs. UNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNAV
UNOV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SNAV
UNOV
Financial Services
SNAV
UNOV
Healthcare
SNAV
UNOV
Industrials
SNAV
UNOV
Consumer Cyclical
SNAV
UNOV
Communication Services
SNAV
UNOV
Consumer Defensive
SNAV
UNOV
Energy
SNAV
UNOV
Utilities
SNAV
UNOV
Real Estate
SNAV
UNOV
Basic Materials
SNAV
UNOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAV vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank
SNAV
UNOV
SNAV vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAV | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.51 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.08 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | 15.01 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAV | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.50 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SNAV vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and UNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAV | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -13.84% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -4.52% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.61% | -9.10% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.22% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -1.66% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 0.93% | +0.86% |
Volatility
SNAV vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison
Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.14%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAV | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 1.14% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 4.67% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 5.58% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 6.83% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 7.72% | +5.92% |
SNAV vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAV vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAV nor UNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 3.29% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAV and UNOV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNAV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to UNOV (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs UNOV's -13.84%.
On 3-year performance, SNAV leads with 15.57% vs 10.20% for UNOV. On fees, UNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SNAV has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.
SNAV and UNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.79% for UNOV.
UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNAV and UNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer