SNAV vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNAV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Mohr Funds, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

SNAV vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.64%	9.91%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and BUFH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	—	—

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-1.53%	-15.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-0.26%	-3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-0.18%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	2.38%	+8.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	2.38%	+11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	2.38%	+11.35%

SNAV vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAV nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and BUFH in my portfolio?

SNAV and BUFH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or BUFH?

On fees, BUFH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or BUFH?

BUFH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or BUFH?

SNAV and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SNAV and BUFH?

SNAV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.95% for BUFH.