BUFH vs. INFO
BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and INFO (Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while INFO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Harbor. Over the past year, BUFH returned 6.24% vs 25.71% for INFO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for INFO.
Performance
BUFH vs. INFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than INFO's 12.43% return.
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH vs. INFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.88% | 3.81% |
INFO Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 12.43% | 14.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFH and INFO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between BUFH and INFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFH vs. INFO — Risk / Return Rank
BUFH
INFO
BUFH vs. INFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF (INFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFH | INFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 2.77 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.22 | 11.97 | +7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFH vs. INFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum INFO drawdown of -19.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and INFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFH | INFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -19.60% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -8.98% | +7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -2.30% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 2.08% | -1.75% |
Volatility
BUFH vs. INFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) is 0.60%, while Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF (INFO) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that BUFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFH | INFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 4.10% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | 10.19% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 13.03% | -10.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 17.33% | -14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 17.33% | -14.99% |
BUFH vs. INFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than INFO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFH vs. INFO - Dividend Comparison
BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INFO Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 0.31% | 0.35% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFH and INFO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFO has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to BUFH (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFH dropped -1.53% vs INFO's -19.60%.
On 1-year performance, INFO leads with 25.71% vs 6.24% for BUFH. On fees, INFO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUFH has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INFO has performed better with a 25.71% return vs 6.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INFO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
INFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while INFO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.35% for INFO.
BUFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFH and INFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer