PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 36.79% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.21%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
36.79%
6M
36.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and AFOS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-11.52%

+9.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-1.41%

+1.23%

Volatility

BUFH vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

21.17%

-18.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.38%

21.17%

-18.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.38%

21.17%

-18.79%

BUFH vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and AFOS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AFOS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer