SMYY vs. QFLR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMYY is a Options Trading fund managed by GraniteShares, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

SMYY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 3.53% return.

SMYY

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: -6.30%
• 6M: -10.23%
• YTD: -6.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 1Y: 16.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMYY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF	-6.40%	-27.35%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	3.53%	3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SMYY and QFLR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

SMYY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 48
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMYY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMYY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.27	—

Drawdowns

SMYY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMYY	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.49%	-13.97%	-23.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.49%	-3.61%	-33.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.31%	-2.51%	-23.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMYY	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.27%	13.52%	+17.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.27%	13.29%	+17.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.27%	13.29%	+17.98%

SMYY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMYY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 198.81%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF	198.81%	53.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMYY and QFLR in my portfolio?

SMYY and QFLR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMYY or QFLR?

On fees, QFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMYY or QFLR?

QFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMYY or QFLR?

SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 198.81%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between SMYY and QFLR?

SMYY is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.89% for QFLR.