SMYY vs. QFLR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR).
SMYY and QFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMYY is managed by GraniteShares. QFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jan 24, 2024.
Performance
SMYY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMYY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | -2.84% | -27.52% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | -2.22% | 3.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's -2.22% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -2.84%
- 6M
- -30.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFLR
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 23.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMYY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank
SMYY
QFLR
SMYY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMYY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.44 | 1.11 | -2.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and QFLR is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SMYY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 117.15%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 117.15% | 53.33% | 0.00% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and QFLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | -13.97% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.12% | -4.77% | -30.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.15% | -2.61% | -20.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility
SMYY vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.06% | 12.32% | +22.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 12.89% | +22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 12.89% | +22.17% |