SMYY vs. PLTM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SMYY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). SMYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

SMYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -19.56% return.

SMYY

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: -7.72%
• YTD: -6.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: -22.81%
• YTD: -19.56%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	$1.27M	$1.47M	$3.03M
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF	$170.95K	$180.38K	$260.75K

SMYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF	-6.99%	-27.35%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-19.56%	27.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SMYY and PLTM is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

SMYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 24
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMYY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.20	—

Drawdowns

SMYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMYY	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.26%	-44.07%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-44.07%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-44.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.89%	-40.58%	+2.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.88%	-18.95%	-7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMYY	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	38.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.77%	50.54%	-19.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.77%	33.15%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.77%	31.14%	-0.37%

SMYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 215.24%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF	215.24%	53.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMYY and PLTM in my portfolio?

SMYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMYY or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMYY or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMYY or PLTM?

SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 215.24%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between SMYY and PLTM?

SMYY is categorized as Options Trading, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.50% for PLTM.