SMYY vs. SAUG
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SAUG.
Performance
SMYY vs. SAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than SAUG's 9.62% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -6.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SAUG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.72K | $109.09K | $121.07K | |
| $170.95K | $180.38K | $260.75K |
SMYY vs. SAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | -6.99% | -27.35% |
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 9.62% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and SAUG is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. SAUG — Risk / Return Rank
SMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAUG
SMYY vs. SAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMYY | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. SAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, which is greater than SAUG's maximum drawdown of -14.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and SAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.26% | -14.62% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.89% | 0.00% | -37.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.88% | -2.13% | -24.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility
SMYY vs. SAUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.77% | 8.71% | +22.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 11.50% | +19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 11.50% | +19.27% |
SMYY vs. SAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SAUG's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. SAUG - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 215.24%, while SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 215.24% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMYY and SAUG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAUG is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAUG is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 215.24%, compared with 0.00% for SAUG.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.90% for SAUG.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and SAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer