SMN vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMN is passively managed, while HOOG is actively managed. Over the past year, SMN returned -26.57% vs -32.55% for HOOG. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

SMN vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -20.64% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -61.32% return.

SMN

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: -20.64%
• 6M: -25.54%
• 1Y: -26.57%
• 3Y*: -15.70%
• 5Y*: -13.64%
• 10Y*: -24.60%

HOOG

• 1D: -13.39%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: -61.32%
• 6M: -72.58%
• 1Y: -32.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMN vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	-20.64%	-15.31%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-61.32%	291.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMN and HOOG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

SMN vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMN

SMN Risk / Return Rank: 3
SMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMN vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMN	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	-0.24	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	0.60	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.07	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	-0.38	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	-0.61	-0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMN vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMN and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMN	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	-0.24	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.53	0.28	-0.82

Drawdowns

SMN vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMN	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-86.94%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.52%	-86.94%	+48.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.91%	-81.96%	-17.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.55%	-37.85%	-52.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.45%	53.71%	-32.26%

Volatility

SMN vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) is 10.97%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 45.54%. This indicates that SMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMN	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.97%	45.54%	-34.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.86%	101.44%	-74.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.06%	137.92%	-103.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.57%	145.39%	-105.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.91%	145.39%	-102.48%

SMN vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMN vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than HOOG's 31.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	31.81%	12.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	4.43%	4.08%	5.02%	4.54%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.72%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMN and HOOG in my portfolio?

SMN and HOOG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMN or HOOG?

HOOG has higher volatility (45.54%) compared to SMN (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

Which ETF is better, SMN or HOOG?

On 1-year performance, SMN leads with -26.57% vs -32.55% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SMN has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMN or HOOG?

Over the 1-year period, SMN has performed better with a -26.57% return vs -32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMN or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMN or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 4.43% for SMN.

What is the main difference between SMN and HOOG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.75% for HOOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.