SMN vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
SMN and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMN is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both SMN and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMN or VGT.
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and VGT is -0.65. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
SMN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMN:
-0.26
VGT:
1.20
SMN:
-0.19
VGT:
1.65
SMN:
0.98
VGT:
1.22
SMN:
-0.07
VGT:
1.76
SMN:
-0.56
VGT:
6.12
SMN:
12.67%
VGT:
4.39%
SMN:
27.41%
VGT:
22.30%
SMN:
-99.90%
VGT:
-54.63%
SMN:
-99.88%
VGT:
-0.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -11.43% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SMN has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of -22.82%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.64% annualized return.
SMN
-11.43%
0.07%
5.03%
-6.06%
-30.30%
-22.82%
VGT
3.17%
1.41%
12.88%
29.47%
20.41%
20.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMN vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMN vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SMN
VGT
SMN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than VGT's 0.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 5.02% | 4.45% | 4.04% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.58% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
SMN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) is 6.63%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that SMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.