PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMN vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMN vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMN vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMN
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials
-19.98%-17.96%7.37%-20.23%-3.03%-15.39%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-22.79%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -19.98% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.


SMN

1D
-2.24%
1M
10.22%
YTD
-19.98%
6M
-23.52%
1Y
-30.96%
3Y*
-14.19%
5Y*
-17.24%
10Y*
-25.70%

BITO

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-43.10%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMN vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMN and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

SMN vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMN
SMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMN vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMNBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

-0.52

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.88

-0.50

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.94

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.42

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-0.89

0.00

SMN vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMN and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMNBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

-0.52

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.08

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between SMN and BITO is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SMN vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMN
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials
4.39%4.08%5.02%4.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.72%0.06%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
80.47%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMN vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMNBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.92%

-77.86%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.71%

-50.05%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.91%

-46.75%

-53.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-36.57%

-53.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.36%

23.73%

+11.63%

Volatility

SMN vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) have volatilities of 12.33% and 12.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMNBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

12.84%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.29%

36.71%

-11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.56%

45.32%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.58%

55.77%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.87%

55.77%

-12.90%