SMMNY vs. CIBR
SMMNY (Siemens Healthineers AG ADR) is a stock, while CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Over the past 5 years, SMMNY returned -5.64%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMNY achieves a -24.19% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
SMMNY
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- -24.19%
- 6M
- -19.37%
- 1Y
- -24.28%
- 3Y*
- -10.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMNY Siemens Healthineers AG ADR | -24.19% | 1.38% | -7.92% | 19.04% | -33.71% | 50.75% | 9.62% | 15.89% | 1.37% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -11.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMNY and CIBR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SMMNY and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMNY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
SMMNY
CIBR
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMNY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | 1.06 | -2.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | 1.56 | -2.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.20 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.18 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | 2.79 | -4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMNY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 1.06 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.66 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.67 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMNY drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMNY and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMNY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -33.89% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -21.99% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.77% | -21.99% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -33.89% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.17% | -2.81% | -41.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -8.66% | -9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.44% | 9.25% | +5.19% |
Volatility
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) is 7.43%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that SMMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMNY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 10.90% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 20.90% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.84% | 24.50% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.56% | 24.95% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.16% | 23.60% | +4.56% |
Dividends
SMMNY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
SMMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
SMMNY Siemens Healthineers AG ADR | 3.06% | 1.85% | 1.96% | 1.73% | 1.93% | 1.28% | 1.08% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMNY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to SMMNY (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMNY dropped -47.57% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMNY and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer