PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMNY vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMNY vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMNY achieves a -23.26% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.68% return.


SMMNY

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
-23.26%
6M
-23.32%
1Y
-24.27%
3Y*
-9.15%
5Y*
-6.07%
10Y*

VB

1D
0.26%
1M
2.83%
YTD
15.68%
6M
13.00%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMNY vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SMMNY
Siemens Healthineers AG ADR
-23.26%1.38%-7.92%19.04%-33.71%50.75%9.62%15.89%1.37%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.68%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMNY and VB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMNY vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMNY
SMMNY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SMMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMNY vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMMNYVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.31

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

3.38

-4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

12.38

-13.93

SMMNY vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMNY and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMMNY vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMNY drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMNY and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMNYVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-59.56%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-8.98%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.77%

-25.36%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.57%

-28.15%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.48%

-0.39%

-43.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-8.42%

-9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.74%

2.44%

+13.30%

Volatility

SMMNY vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that SMMNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMNYVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

4.92%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

12.21%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.20%

16.66%

+8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.61%

20.78%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

21.45%

+6.69%

Dividends

SMMNY vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SMMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMMNY
Siemens Healthineers AG ADR
3.02%1.85%1.96%1.73%1.93%1.28%1.08%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMNY and VB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMNY has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMNY dropped -47.57% vs VB's -59.56%.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMNY and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer