PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SMMD vs. FNDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and FNDA is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

SMMD vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10.63%
10.80%
SMMD
FNDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMMD:

0.75

FNDA:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

SMMD:

1.14

FNDA:

0.88

Omega Ratio

SMMD:

1.14

FNDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

SMMD:

0.98

FNDA:

1.09

Martin Ratio

SMMD:

3.77

FNDA:

2.77

Ulcer Index

SMMD:

3.45%

FNDA:

3.56%

Daily Std Dev

SMMD:

17.46%

FNDA:

18.31%

Max Drawdown

SMMD:

-41.06%

FNDA:

-44.64%

Current Drawdown

SMMD:

-7.48%

FNDA:

-7.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 9.47% return.


SMMD

YTD

12.32%

1M

-6.15%

6M

9.83%

1Y

12.22%

5Y*

8.85%

10Y*

N/A

FNDA

YTD

9.47%

1M

-6.23%

6M

10.03%

1Y

9.27%

5Y*

10.20%

10Y*

9.24%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMMD vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for FNDA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for SMMD: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMMD vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMMD, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.750.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMMD, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.140.88
The chart of Omega ratio for SMMD, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.141.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMMD, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.981.09
The chart of Martin ratio for SMMD, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.772.77
SMMD
FNDA

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and FNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.75
0.54
SMMD
FNDA

Dividends

SMMD vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FNDA's 1.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.26%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.79%2.16%1.83%1.42%2.04%1.57%2.37%2.00%1.19%1.33%1.65%0.65%

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-7.48%
-7.85%
SMMD
FNDA

Volatility

SMMD vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.36%
5.35%
SMMD
FNDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab