SMMD vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
SMMD and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMMD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both SMMD and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMMD or FNDA.
Correlation
The correlation between SMMD and FNDA is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SMMD vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMMD:
-0.67
FNDA:
-0.65
SMMD:
-0.80
FNDA:
-0.78
SMMD:
0.90
FNDA:
0.90
SMMD:
-0.52
FNDA:
-0.50
SMMD:
-2.08
FNDA:
-1.97
SMMD:
6.37%
FNDA:
6.63%
SMMD:
19.84%
FNDA:
20.08%
SMMD:
-41.06%
FNDA:
-44.64%
SMMD:
-25.50%
FNDA:
-25.92%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMMD having a -19.15% return and FNDA slightly lower at -19.55%.
SMMD
-19.15%
-14.57%
-17.65%
-13.68%
10.03%
N/A
FNDA
-19.55%
-15.03%
-18.00%
-13.72%
13.12%
6.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMMD vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMMD vs. FNDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SMMD
FNDA
SMMD vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMMD vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FNDA's 2.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 2.69% | 2.51% | 1.95% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 1.38% | 2.85% | 1.83% | 1.49% | 2.29% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
SMMD vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMMD vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) have volatilities of 10.07% and 10.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.