SMLV vs. SCHV
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLV returned 10.42%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for SCHV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
SMLV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 14.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMLV having a 10.42% annualized return and SCHV not far ahead at 10.94%.
SMLV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
SMLV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 22.24% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.69% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and SCHV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SMLV and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMLV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
SCHV
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
SMLV
SCHV
Industrials
SMLV
SCHV
Real Estate
SMLV
SCHV
Technology
SMLV
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
SCHV
Healthcare
SMLV
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
SCHV
Basic Materials
SMLV
SCHV
Utilities
SMLV
SCHV
Communication Services
SMLV
SCHV
Energy
SMLV
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
SCHV
SMLV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMLV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.33 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 12.95 | -1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -37.08% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -6.83% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -15.26% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -19.78% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | -37.08% | -5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -3.42% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -3.81% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.75% | +0.85% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.33%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.33% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 8.87% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 11.21% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 14.52% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 16.92% | +3.99% |
SMLV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMLV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SCHV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.23% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SCHV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.94% vs 10.42% for SMLV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.82% for SCHV.
SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer