SMLF vs. ISCB
SMLF (iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF) and ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - SMLF tracks the STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor Index while ISCB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLF returned 12.07%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for ISCB. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMLF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ISCB.
Performance
SMLF vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMLF having a 15.73% return and ISCB slightly lower at 14.99%. Over the past 10 years, SMLF has outperformed ISCB with an annualized return of 12.07%, while ISCB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.
SMLF
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $562.81K | $433.76K | $308.14K | |
| $11.55M | $13.63M | $14.55M |
SMLF vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | 15.73% | 12.30% | 16.33% | 19.99% | -12.19% | 26.53% | 8.38% | 21.56% | -8.42% | 12.70% |
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 14.99% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | -19.04% | 17.46% | 6.29% | 29.42% | -13.92% | 12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLF and ISCB is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SMLF and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLF vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLF
ISCB
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
SMLF
ISCB
Industrials
SMLF
ISCB
Healthcare
SMLF
ISCB
Financial Services
SMLF
ISCB
Consumer Cyclical
SMLF
ISCB
Real Estate
SMLF
ISCB
Basic Materials
SMLF
ISCB
Energy
SMLF
ISCB
Communication Services
SMLF
ISCB
Consumer Defensive
SMLF
ISCB
Utilities
SMLF
ISCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLF vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank
SMLF
ISCB
SMLF vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMLF | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.88 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 10.43 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMLF vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and ISCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLF | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -61.25% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -9.39% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.28% | -26.22% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.28% | -29.94% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | -44.18% | +2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -1.57% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -9.74% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.59% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SMLF vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 3.32%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLF | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 11.48% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 16.46% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 21.27% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 22.61% | -0.85% |
SMLF vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMLF vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison
SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than ISCB's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.28% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SMLF and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMLF has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to ISCB (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs ISCB's -61.25%.
On 10-year performance, SMLF leads with 12.07% vs 9.25% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SMLF.
ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.02% for SMLF.
SMLF tracks STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMLF and 0.04% for ISCB.
ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLF and ISCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer