PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. FZIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than FZIPX's 17.78% return.


SMLF

1D
-0.34%
1M
-2.11%
6M
11.39%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
12.07%
ALL TIME*
11.32%

FZIPX

1D
1.14%
1M
-1.27%
6M
12.50%
YTD
17.78%
1Y
30.97%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$11.55M$13.63M$14.55M

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
15.73%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-17.11%
FZIPX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund
17.78%12.51%12.39%18.13%-18.01%21.31%16.64%26.50%-17.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and FZIPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.97

The correlation between SMLF and FZIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. FZIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FZIPX
FZIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FZIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLFFZIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.90

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

10.99

-0.96

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FZIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLF and FZIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FZIPX drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and FZIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFFZIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-42.71%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-9.61%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-25.16%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-28.19%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-2.14%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-8.76%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.54%

+0.06%

Volatility

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) at 3.57%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFFZIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.57%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

12.66%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

17.28%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

20.88%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

23.67%

-1.91%

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FZIPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLF vs. FZIPX - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FZIPX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZIPX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund
1.05%1.24%1.22%1.43%1.64%6.97%2.15%1.80%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
1.02%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SMLF and FZIPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FZIPX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs FZIPX's -42.71%.

FZIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and FZIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer