PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.32% return.


SMLF

1D
0.48%
1M
4.34%
YTD
15.29%
6M
16.02%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
12.44%

SMMV

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.32%
6M
3.51%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLF vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
15.29%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-8.42%12.70%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.32%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%14.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and SMMV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2016

0.85

The correlation between SMLF and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLF vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLF
SMMV

Industrials

19.8%
13.8%

Technology

16.6%
10.9%

Financial Services

15.0%
10.9%

Healthcare

12.7%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

5.7%
13.4%

Energy

4.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
5.4%

Utilities

2.2%
7.7%

Industrials

SMLF
19.8%
SMMV
13.8%

Technology

SMLF
16.6%
SMMV
10.9%

Financial Services

SMLF
15.0%
SMMV
10.9%

Healthcare

SMLF
12.7%
SMMV
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLF
11.8%
SMMV
5.6%

Real Estate

SMLF
5.7%
SMMV
13.4%

Energy

SMLF
4.8%
SMMV
4.5%

Basic Materials

SMLF
4.6%
SMMV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

SMLF
3.7%
SMMV
8.1%

Communication Services

SMLF
3.2%
SMMV
5.4%

Utilities

SMLF
2.2%
SMMV
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLF vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLFSMMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

0.74

+1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

1.13

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

0.99

+2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.38

3.17

+10.21

SMLF vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLF and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLFSMMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.74

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.37

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.52

+0.02

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-38.77%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-7.02%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-13.68%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-18.00%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.18%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-5.10%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.18%

+0.35%

Volatility

SMLF vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.27%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

6.34%

+5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

9.73%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

13.50%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

15.70%

+6.09%

SMLF vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLF vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SMMV's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.03%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.74%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLF and SMMV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, SMLF leads with 11.16% vs 4.97% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SMLF.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.03% for SMLF.

SMLF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMMV is Small Cap Growth Equities. SMLF tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SMLF and 0.20% for SMMV.

SMLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer