PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 23.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLF has outperformed SMLV with an annualized return of 12.07%, while SMLV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


SMLF

1D
-0.34%
1M
-2.11%
6M
11.39%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
12.07%
ALL TIME*
11.32%

SMLV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
16.25%
YTD
23.05%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.55M$13.63M$14.55M
$451.73K$474.34K$539.60K

SMLF vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
15.73%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-8.42%12.70%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
23.05%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and SMLV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.83

The correlation between SMLF and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLF vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLF
SMLV

Technology

19.2%
11.8%

Industrials

18.9%
14.3%

Healthcare

14.4%
8.9%

Financial Services

14.1%
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
9.0%

Real Estate

5.7%
11.9%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.3%

Energy

3.9%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
3.5%

Utilities

2.0%
2.7%

Technology

SMLF
19.2%
SMLV
11.8%

Industrials

SMLF
18.9%
SMLV
14.3%

Healthcare

SMLF
14.4%
SMLV
8.9%

Financial Services

SMLF
14.1%
SMLV
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLF
11.7%
SMLV
9.0%

Real Estate

SMLF
5.7%
SMLV
11.9%

Basic Materials

SMLF
4.2%
SMLV
3.3%

Energy

SMLF
3.9%
SMLV
1.5%

Communication Services

SMLF
2.9%
SMLV
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMLF
2.9%
SMLV
3.5%

Utilities

SMLF
2.0%
SMLV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMLF vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLFSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.43

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

12.96

-2.93

SMLF vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLF and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-42.45%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-7.34%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-20.40%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-20.40%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

-42.45%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-1.22%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-5.40%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.50%

+0.10%

Volatility

SMLF vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 3.67%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.67%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

9.58%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

15.38%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

18.21%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

20.90%

+0.86%

SMLF vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLF vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SMLV's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
1.02%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.21%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLF and SMLV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SMLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 10-year performance, SMLF leads with 12.07% vs 10.64% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SMLF.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.02% for SMLF.

SMLF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Low Volatility. SMLF tracks STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMLF and 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer