PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIZ vs. ZECP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
0.22%12.16%17.92%16.39%
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
-2.68%15.03%17.32%10.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIZ achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than ZECP's -2.68% return.


SMIZ

1D
3.63%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
0.22%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZECP

1D
2.39%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
1.41%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMIZ vs. ZECP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than ZECP's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMIZ vs. ZECP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIZ
SMIZ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ZECP
ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIZZECPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

0.88

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.36

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.37

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

6.31

+1.31

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the ZECP Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIZ and ZECP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIZZECPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

0.88

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.51

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between SMIZ and ZECP is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Dividend Comparison

SMIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than ZECP's 0.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
0.62%0.62%1.57%0.07%0.00%0.00%
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
0.81%0.79%0.63%0.73%0.91%0.11%

Drawdowns

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIZ drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, which is greater than ZECP's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIZ and ZECP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIZZECPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-21.86%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-10.52%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-6.13%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.68%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.28%

+0.78%

Volatility

SMIZ vs. ZECP - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) at 4.47%. This indicates that SMIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZECP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMIZZECPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.55%

4.47%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

7.83%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.13%

15.20%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

14.75%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

14.75%

+4.28%