PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHX vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMHX vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMHX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
62.79%
6M
59.69%
1Y
101.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
9.95%
1M
27.07%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHX vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and DRAM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.66

SMHX vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMHX
DRAM

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SMHX
100.0%
DRAM
100.0%

Basic Materials

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Communication Services

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Energy

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Financial Services

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Healthcare

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Industrials

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Real Estate

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Utilities

SMHX

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMHX vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHX vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHXDRAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

SMHX vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHXDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.53%

-19.97%

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-4.74%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-3.30%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

Volatility

SMHX vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHXDRAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.58%

93.13%

-56.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.40%

93.13%

-51.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.40%

93.13%

-51.73%

SMHX vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMHX vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.01%0.02%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMHX and DRAM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

SMHX has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

SMHX is categorized as Semiconductors, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMHX and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer