PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SMH vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SMH vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 35.67%/yr for QLD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

SMH vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 32.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMH having a 37.49% annualized return and QLD not far behind at 35.67%.

SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
11.44%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
141.99%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%

QLD

1D
1.30%
1M
2.58%
YTD
32.65%
6M
32.82%
1Y
73.89%
3Y*
44.57%
5Y*
23.24%
10Y*
35.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ		32.65%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and QLD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

0.82

The correlation between SMH and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMH vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SMH
QLD

Technology

100.0%
58.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

2.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
QLD
58.7%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

QLD
1.0%

Communication Services

SMH

-

QLD
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

QLD
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

QLD
6.4%

Energy

SMH

-

QLD
0.5%

Financial Services

SMH

-

QLD
0.2%

Healthcare

SMH

-

QLD
3.7%

Industrials

SMH

-

QLD
2.6%

Real Estate

SMH

-

QLD
0.1%

Utilities

SMH

-

QLD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

ProShares Ultra QQQ

Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK
Often compared with QLD:
QLD vs. QQQQLD vs. TQQQQLD vs. SSOQLD vs. QQQMQLD vs. UPROQLD vs. VOOQLD vs. SPY

Return for Risk

SMH vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SMHQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.13
2.04

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.26
2.48

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.33

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

2.78

+6.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.74

9.46

+24.28

SMH vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and QLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SMHQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-83.13%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-25.13%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-42.29%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-63.68%

+18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-63.68%

+18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-7.11%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-18.16%

-22.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

7.36%

-3.30%

Volatility

SMH vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 15.14%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SMHQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

15.14%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.73%

27.51%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.20%

34.29%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.47%

45.07%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.82%

44.73%

-11.91%

SMH vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ		0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

SMH and QLD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to QLD (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 35.67% for QLD. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 15.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 35.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.95% for QLD.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer