PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 50.09% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 34.16%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.


SMH

1D
0.30%
1M
-12.88%
6M
33.97%
YTD
50.09%
1Y
87.76%
3Y*
50.56%
5Y*
33.46%
10Y*
34.16%
ALL TIME*
11.06%

MGK

1D
1.11%
1M
-1.80%
6M
6.56%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
18.26%
ALL TIME*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.42M$123.75M$142.35M
$8.28B$7.64B$7.07B

SMH vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
50.09%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
4.77%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and MGK is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.79

The correlation between SMH and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMH vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMH
MGK

Technology

100.0%
58.7%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.0%

Healthcare

-

4.9%

Industrials

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
MGK
58.7%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

MGK
0.4%

Communication Services

SMH

-

MGK
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

MGK
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

MGK
0.4%

Energy

SMH

-

MGK

-

Financial Services

SMH

-

MGK
4.0%

Healthcare

SMH

-

MGK
4.9%

Industrials

SMH

-

MGK
2.7%

Real Estate

SMH

-

MGK
1.2%

Utilities

SMH

-

MGK
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMH vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

0.83

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

2.57

+12.07

SMH vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-48.43%

-36.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.62%

-16.85%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-23.36%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-36.01%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-36.01%

-9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.19%

-6.13%

-13.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-7.57%

-33.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

5.40%

+0.61%

Volatility

SMH vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.90%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.70%

5.90%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.13%

14.66%

+18.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.57%

18.25%

+20.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.50%

22.93%

+13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.32%

22.02%

+11.30%

SMH vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than MGK's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.34%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and MGK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to MGK (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 34.16% vs 18.26% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 34.16% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.20% for SMH.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.05% for MGK.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer