SMH vs. MGK
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for MGK. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
SMH vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 37.49%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 18.85% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
SMH vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and MGK is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SMH and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMH vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
MGK
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
MGK
Basic Materials
SMH
-
MGK
Communication Services
SMH
-
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
MGK
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
MGK
Energy
SMH
-
MGK
-
Financial Services
SMH
-
MGK
Healthcare
SMH
-
MGK
Industrials
SMH
-
MGK
Real Estate
SMH
-
MGK
Utilities
SMH
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
MGK
SMH vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.24 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 1.37 | +7.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 4.65 | +29.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -48.43% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -16.85% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -23.36% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -36.01% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -36.01% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -5.63% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -7.58% | -33.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 4.97% | -0.91% |
Volatility
SMH vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 5.96% | +10.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 13.29% | +14.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 16.87% | +16.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 22.72% | +12.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 21.93% | +10.89% |
SMH vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and MGK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 18.85% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 18.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
MGK has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.05% for MGK.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer