SMH vs. HUMN
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. SMH is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.
Performance
SMH vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 18.42% return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
HUMN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 31.27% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 18.42% | 20.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and HUMN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.71 |
SMH vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
HUMN
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
HUMN
Basic Materials
SMH
-
HUMN
Communication Services
SMH
-
HUMN
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
HUMN
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
HUMN
-
Energy
SMH
-
HUMN
-
Financial Services
SMH
-
HUMN
Healthcare
SMH
-
HUMN
-
Industrials
SMH
-
HUMN
Real Estate
SMH
-
HUMN
-
Utilities
SMH
-
HUMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
HUMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and HUMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -20.40% | -64.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -9.15% | +6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -4.55% | -36.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility
SMH vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 30.67% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 30.67% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 30.67% | +2.15% |
SMH vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than HUMN's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.61% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and HUMN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.75% for HUMN.
Find the right allocation for SMH and HUMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer