PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMAP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

HACK

1D
-0.86%
1M
14.67%
6M
38.64%
YTD
36.97%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
29.52%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
16.13%
ALL TIME*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
7.23%3.63%-2.93%
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
36.97%7.97%7.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and HACK is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.47

The correlation between SMAP and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMAP vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMAP
HACK

Industrials

22.3%
8.8%

Healthcare

17.5%

-

Technology

13.9%
90.8%

Financial Services

13.1%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Basic Materials

7.9%

-

Energy

6.6%

-

Real Estate

5.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

SMAP
22.3%
HACK
8.8%

Healthcare

SMAP
17.5%
HACK

-

Technology

SMAP
13.9%
HACK
90.8%

Financial Services

SMAP
13.1%
HACK
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SMAP
11.1%
HACK

-

Basic Materials

SMAP
7.9%
HACK

-

Energy

SMAP
6.6%
HACK

-

Real Estate

SMAP
5.6%
HACK

-

Consumer Defensive

SMAP
2.0%
HACK

-

Communication Services

SMAP

-

HACK

-

Utilities

SMAP

-

HACK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAPHACKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

SMAP vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.76%

Volatility

SMAP vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

SMAP vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMAP and HACK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

SMAP vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than HACK's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.05%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.32%0.48%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAP and HACK have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMAP and HACK have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

SMAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.05% for HACK.

SMAP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer