SMAP vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMAP is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMAP returned 12.04% vs 103.56% for BATT. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

SMAP vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMAP achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 26.16% return.

SMAP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 5.82%
• 1Y: 12.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF	7.25%	3.65%	-2.34%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	59.70%	-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and BATT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	0.50

SMAP vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMAP	BATT
Industrials	22.3%	16.9%
Healthcare	17.5%	-
Technology	13.9%	5.6%
Financial Services	13.1%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	18.9%
Basic Materials	7.9%	57.0%
Energy	6.6%	-
Real Estate	5.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMAP vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

SMAP Risk / Return Rank: 25
SMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMAP	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	3.38	-2.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	3.69	-2.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.50	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	6.12	-4.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.15	22.20	-18.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMAP vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMAP and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMAP	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	3.38	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.01	+0.26

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMAP drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAP and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMAP	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.12%	-69.38%	+45.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-17.03%	+7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-3.44%	+3.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	-34.78%	+27.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	4.68%	-1.77%

Volatility

SMAP vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is 3.49%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that SMAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMAP	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	10.29%	-6.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.44%	24.67%	-13.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	30.80%	-15.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.63%	29.57%	-9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	30.60%	-10.97%

SMAP vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMAP vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BATT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF	0.42%	0.48%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMAP and BATT in my portfolio?

SMAP and BATT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMAP or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to SMAP (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMAP dropped -24.12% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, SMAP or BATT?

On 1-year performance, BATT leads with 103.56% vs 12.04% for SMAP. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SMAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMAP or BATT?

Over the 1-year period, BATT has performed better with a 103.56% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMAP or BATT?

BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMAP or BATT?

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.42% for SMAP.

What is the main difference between SMAP and BATT?

SMAP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BATT is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.59% for BATT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.