PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SLYV vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SLYV vs. XSVM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.61%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.

Performance

SLYV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 20.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 10.61%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.

SLYV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.91%
YTD
17.46%
6M
15.89%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.61%

XSVM

1D
0.77%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.98%
6M
18.82%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF		17.46%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF		20.98%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and XSVM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.92

The correlation between SLYV and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SLYV
XSVM

Financial Services

19.5%
38.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
17.4%

Technology

13.4%
9.5%

Industrials

11.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

8.6%
4.8%

Healthcare

7.3%
1.1%

Energy

7.0%
9.3%

Basic Materials

6.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
6.9%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.5%
XSVM
38.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.4%
XSVM
17.4%

Technology

SLYV
13.4%
XSVM
9.5%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
XSVM
6.3%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.6%
XSVM
4.8%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.3%
XSVM
1.1%

Energy

SLYV
7.0%
XSVM
9.3%

Basic Materials

SLYV
6.9%
XSVM
2.0%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
XSVM
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
XSVM
6.9%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
XSVM
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF

Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF

Often compared with SLYV:
SLYV vs. AVUVSLYV vs. SLYGSLYV vs. VOOSLYV vs. VBRSLYV vs. SPYSLYV vs. VIOVSLYV vs. IWM
Often compared with XSVM:
XSVM vs. XSMOXSVM vs. AVUVXSVM vs. RWJXSVM vs. XSHQXSVM vs. SPHBXSVM vs. DGRSXSVM vs. RYPRX

Return for Risk

SLYV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SLYVXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.06
2.03

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.97
2.93

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.70

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

11.45

+1.85

SLYV vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and XSVM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SLYVXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-62.57%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.08%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-26.21%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-26.21%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-49.02%

+1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.73%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-11.54%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.25%

-0.43%

Volatility

SLYV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SLYVXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.63%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

12.28%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

18.54%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

22.55%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

25.07%

-1.13%

SLYV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLYV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than XSVM's 1.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF		1.87%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF		1.82%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, SLYV and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to XSVM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.32% vs 10.61% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.82% for XSVM.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.37% for XSVM.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer