SLYV vs. USVM
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLYV returned 6.20%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
SLYV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 18.75% return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
USVM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 17.46% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 3.62% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 18.75% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and USVM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SLYV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
USVM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
USVM
Technology
SLYV
USVM
Industrials
SLYV
USVM
Real Estate
SLYV
USVM
Healthcare
SLYV
USVM
Energy
SLYV
USVM
Basic Materials
SLYV
USVM
Communication Services
SLYV
USVM
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
USVM
Utilities
SLYV
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
USVM
SLYV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.94 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 14.82 | -1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -42.38% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.36% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -24.34% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -25.27% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.24% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -7.85% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.22% | +0.60% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.10%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.10% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 11.04% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 14.96% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 19.64% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 21.97% | +1.97% |
SLYV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than USVM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SLYV and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to USVM (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 10.06% vs 6.20% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.77% for USVM.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer