SLYV vs. SMLV
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.21%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for SMLV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
SLYV vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLYV having a 21.58% return and SMLV slightly higher at 22.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.21% annualized return and SMLV not far ahead at 10.46%.
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
SMLV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
SLYV vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 22.65% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and SMLV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SLYV and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
SMLV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
SMLV
Industrials
SLYV
SMLV
Technology
SLYV
SMLV
Real Estate
SLYV
SMLV
Healthcare
SLYV
SMLV
Energy
SLYV
SMLV
Basic Materials
SLYV
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
SMLV
Communication Services
SLYV
SMLV
Utilities
SLYV
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
SMLV
SLYV vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.96 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 11.15 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than SMLV's maximum drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -42.45% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.34% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -20.40% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -20.40% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -42.45% | -5.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.26% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -5.41% | -3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.60% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.69% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 10.08% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 15.43% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 18.22% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 20.90% | +3.00% |
SLYV vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than SMLV's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.22% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and SMLV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to SLYV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.46% vs 10.21% for SLYV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.80% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.12% for SMLV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer