PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. IEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 22.30% return, which is significantly higher than IEFA's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 10.25%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


SLYV

1D
1.61%
1M
1.99%
6M
13.64%
YTD
22.30%
1Y
41.75%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
10.25%
ALL TIME*
10.80%

IEFA

1D
0.43%
1M
1.41%
6M
6.08%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$866.09M$876.15M$940.56M
$18.38M$15.69M$22.81M

SLYV vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
22.30%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
12.10%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and IEFA is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.68

The correlation between SLYV and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
IEFA

Financial Services

21.6%
23.1%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
8.1%

Industrials

12.3%
19.7%

Technology

11.3%
12.6%

Real Estate

8.2%
2.8%

Energy

7.3%
3.3%

Healthcare

6.3%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
6.5%

Basic Materials

5.7%
6.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.3%

Utilities

2.1%
3.5%

Financial Services

SLYV
21.6%
IEFA
23.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.5%
IEFA
8.1%

Industrials

SLYV
12.3%
IEFA
19.7%

Technology

SLYV
11.3%
IEFA
12.6%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.2%
IEFA
2.8%

Energy

SLYV
7.3%
IEFA
3.3%

Healthcare

SLYV
6.3%
IEFA
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
5.7%
IEFA
6.5%

Basic Materials

SLYV
5.7%
IEFA
6.3%

Communication Services

SLYV
3.8%
IEFA
4.3%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
IEFA
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYV vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVIEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

2.19

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

8.42

+7.06

SLYV vs. IEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and IEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-34.78%

-26.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-11.50%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-13.76%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-30.41%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-34.78%

-12.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-6.63%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.99%

-0.28%

Volatility

SLYV vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 3.80%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.60%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

13.60%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

15.68%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

16.64%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

17.04%

+6.86%

SLYV vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than IEFA's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.33%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.79%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYV and IEFA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEFA has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to SLYV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs IEFA's -34.78%.

On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.25% vs 9.52% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.79% for SLYV.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.07% for IEFA.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and IEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer