PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.33%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
0.82%
1M
5.34%
YTD
20.04%
6M
16.26%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
11.33%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
1.30%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
20.04%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and VEA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.73

The correlation between SLYG and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
VEA

Technology

20.5%
13.8%

Industrials

19.2%
19.2%

Healthcare

14.3%
8.2%

Financial Services

13.6%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.5%

Real Estate

6.2%
2.7%

Energy

4.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
5.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
7.5%

Utilities

1.9%
3.3%

Technology

SLYG
20.5%
VEA
13.8%

Industrials

SLYG
19.2%
VEA
19.2%

Healthcare

SLYG
14.3%
VEA
8.2%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.6%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
10.7%
VEA
7.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.2%
VEA
2.7%

Energy

SLYG
4.9%
VEA
5.4%

Communication Services

SLYG
3.0%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
2.9%
VEA
5.6%

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.7%
VEA
7.5%

Utilities

SLYG
1.9%
VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.58

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

9.92

+1.68

SLYG vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-60.68%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-11.63%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-13.45%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-29.71%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-35.73%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.06%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-13.28%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.02%

-0.43%

Volatility

SLYG vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 5.57%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

6.84%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

14.38%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

16.58%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

16.72%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

17.40%

+5.36%

SLYG vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.68%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and VEA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SLYG (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.33% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer