SLYG vs. UTF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 10.83%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for UTF. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLYG vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 10.83%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.

SLYG

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

UTF

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 11.33%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	15.50%	5.20%	9.38%	17.27%	-21.26%	22.42%	19.48%	20.97%	-4.20%	14.62%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	14.60%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and UTF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2004	0.49

The correlation between SLYG and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLYG vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG

SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 48
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 63
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLYG	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.92	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.35	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.16	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	1.10	+1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	2.25	+7.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLYG vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLYG	UTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	0.92	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.35	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.50	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.45	-0.14

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLYG	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.15%	-72.62%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-10.33%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	-21.06%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.18%	-30.28%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.86%	-52.53%	+10.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-1.69%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.55%	-10.37%	-4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	5.05%	-2.45%

Volatility

SLYG vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.78%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLYG	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	2.78%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.47%	8.39%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	12.33%	+5.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.51%	18.33%	+3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	23.37%	-0.63%

Dividends

SLYG vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than UTF's 6.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	0.71%	0.86%	1.22%	1.18%	1.18%	0.68%	0.71%	1.08%	1.06%	4.74%	1.13%	5.75%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.98%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLYG and UTF in my portfolio?

SLYG and UTF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLYG or UTF?

SLYG has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to UTF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs UTF's -72.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.