UTF vs. RNP
UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) and RNP (Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, UTF returned 11.49%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for RNP. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
UTF vs. RNP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than RNP's 7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed RNP with an annualized return of 11.49%, while RNP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.90% annualized return.
UTF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
RNP
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.73M | $1.82M | $2.20M | |
| $6.45M | $6.34M | $7.48M |
UTF vs. RNP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 20.28% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.80% | 2.57% | 11.88% | 7.73% | -19.95% | 32.84% | 3.31% | 43.14% | -9.46% | 19.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTF and RNP is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2004 | 0.52 |
The correlation between UTF and RNP shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UTF:
$2.69B
RNP:
$981.60M
UTF:
$6.79
RNP:
$3.11
UTF:
4.09
RNP:
6.58
UTF:
0.03
RNP:
0.02
UTF:
6.96
RNP:
6.55
UTF:
0.94
RNP:
0.99
UTF:
$387.16M
RNP:
$149.86M
UTF:
$388.42M
RNP:
$180.36M
UTF:
$765.72M
RNP:
$141.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTF vs. RNP — Risk / Return Rank
UTF
RNP
UTF vs. RNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.00 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | -0.07 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -0.15 | +3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTF vs. RNP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, smaller than the maximum RNP drawdown of -86.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and RNP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.62% | -86.93% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -11.90% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -18.02% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -36.19% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.53% | -56.68% | +4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -3.24% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -13.06% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 5.33% | -0.28% |
Volatility
UTF vs. RNP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.59%, while Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 10.43% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 13.41% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 20.77% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 24.25% | -0.95% |
Dividends
UTF vs. RNP - Dividend Comparison
UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than RNP's 7.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.98% | 8.22% | 7.81% | 8.10% | 13.26% | 5.20% | 6.52% | 6.25% | 8.36% | 7.00% | 7.75% | 8.03% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.82% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
UTF vs. RNP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UTF and RNP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNP has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to UTF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs RNP's -86.93%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTF and RNP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer