UTF vs. ASGI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI).

ASGI is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jul 29, 2020.

Performance

UTF vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UTF vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	9.32%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	13.37%
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	2.90%	44.20%	10.26%	14.48%	-10.50%	18.17%	-0.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than ASGI's 2.90% return.

UTF

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 10.92%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

ASGI

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -10.72%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 36.99%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UTF vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 62
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

ASGI

ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 89
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTF	ASGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.95	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.50	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.37	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	2.39	-1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	9.49	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTF vs. ASGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ASGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and ASGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTF	ASGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	1.95	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.75	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.74	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and ASGI is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UTF vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, less than ASGI's 11.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	7.13%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	11.31%	10.96%	12.84%	8.03%	8.25%	6.33%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UTF vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and ASGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTF	ASGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.62%	-23.71%	-48.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	-15.15%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.28%	-23.71%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-11.09%	+6.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-5.95%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	3.82%	+1.47%

Volatility

UTF vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 4.56%, while Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTF	ASGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	9.35%	-4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	15.50%	-6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	19.10%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.51%	16.88%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.38%	17.35%	+6.03%