PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTF vs. ETV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UTF vs. ETV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than ETV's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed ETV with an annualized return of 11.48%, while ETV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.


UTF

1D
0.26%
1M
0.84%
YTD
16.34%
6M
17.80%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
11.48%

ETV

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.27%
YTD
7.39%
6M
6.57%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTF vs. ETV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
16.34%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%
ETV
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
7.39%8.63%27.67%9.94%-19.73%18.41%13.03%21.25%-4.29%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UTF and ETV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005

0.48

The correlation between UTF and ETV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTF:

$2.62B

ETV:

$1.73B

EPS

UTF:

$6.79

ETV:

$4.95

PE Ratio

UTF:

3.98

ETV:

2.99

PEG Ratio

UTF:

0.03

ETV:

0.10

PS Ratio

UTF:

6.76

ETV:

5.69

PB Ratio

UTF:

0.92

ETV:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTF:

$387.16M

ETV:

$303.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTF:

$388.42M

ETV:

$149.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

UTF:

$765.72M

ETV:

$578.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTF vs. ETV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ETV
ETV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ETV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ETV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTF vs. ETV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTFETVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.95

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

9.91

-7.20

UTF vs. ETV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the ETV Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTF and ETV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTF vs. ETV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than ETV's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and ETV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTFETVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.62%

-52.11%

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-10.34%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-20.27%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

-22.71%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.53%

-42.39%

-10.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.74%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-5.57%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

2.03%

+3.02%

Volatility

UTF vs. ETV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.41%, while Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTFETVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

3.19%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

10.22%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

12.51%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

16.91%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

19.30%

+4.06%

Dividends

UTF vs. ETV - Dividend Comparison

UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than ETV's 8.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETV
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
8.05%8.30%8.18%9.24%10.57%7.94%8.66%8.89%9.86%8.65%8.96%8.69%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
6.96%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Financials

UTF vs. ETV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
144.46M
72.11M
(UTF) Total Revenue
(ETV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UTF and ETV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to UTF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs ETV's -52.11%.

ETV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTF and ETV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer