SLYG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. SLYG is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SLYG returned 29.26% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 23.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

SLYG

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.27%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 23.97%
• 1Y: 29.26%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 11.14%

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	23.97%	5.20%	-0.64%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and MSTZ is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

SLYG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG

SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 65
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLYG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.64	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.34	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.86	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	5.59	+5.28

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLYG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.92%	-99.38%	+36.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-84.89%	+75.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-97.51%	+95.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.86%	-94.53%	+79.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	43.41%	-40.81%

Volatility

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 5.18%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLYG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	56.46%	-51.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	135.20%	-122.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	148.41%	-130.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.56%	171.17%	-149.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	171.17%	-148.47%

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLYG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	0.65%	0.86%	1.22%	1.18%	1.18%	0.68%	0.71%	1.08%	1.06%	4.74%	1.13%	5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLYG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

SLYG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLYG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to SLYG (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, SLYG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 29.26% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLYG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 29.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLYG or MSTZ?

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLYG or MSTZ?

SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between SLYG and MSTZ?

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.